div xmlns:cc=http://creativecommons.org/ns# about=http://www.flickr.com/photos/lilahpops/2420799856/a rel=cc:attributionURL href=

People have been predicting that electronic books will become the primary literary format for quite a while now, but it’s only recently that the path to a predominantly e-book ecosystem has become clear. E-readers like the Kindle and devices like the iPad that are optimized for reading are still nascent technologies, but already we’re seeing mainstream use to the point where the eventual mass adoption of such devices seems obvious. There are many questions about what this will mean for reading, from behavioral shifts to economic adjustments, but the question that has been most compelling to me lately is this: What is the role of the printed book in an e-book society?

My suspicion is that the book as a physical artifact will begin to take on a position of privilege in a number of ways. One is privilege from a socio-economic standpoint, in that being able to afford physical books (And possibly even the desire for physical books) may become an indicator of class. But I think that it will also be a mark of privilege for the book itself. I was thumbing through one of Edward Tufte’s books the other day and thinking that the experience of reading his books is one that could never be effectively translated to a purely electronic medium. The sense of elegance, thoughtfulness, and importance of his books are partly conveyed by the tactile experience — the quality of the paper, the book’s dimensions and heft, the typesetting, etc. It communicates a lot of meta-information about itself through it’s object-ness. It comes back to the problem of digital objects seeming inherently more disposable and less valuable than their physical counterparts. As a result, I think that books that we deem “important” or “beautiful” will still tend to be consumed (and shared, and displayed) as physical artifacts, whereas the rest of our literary pursuits will be relegated to the more functional and lesser status as electronic media.

In writing this, I do wonder if there is any way that electronic books and publications can convey a greater importance and value. As a designer, I wonder what kinds of design interventions might bring some of the tactile joy of reading a well-designed physical book to screen-based environments.

I would love to hear your thoughts on this in the comments. What kinds of books or publications, if any, would you see as being reserved for a print experience? What kinds of design interventions might make the e-book experience better and more tangible?


One Response to “Printed books as privileged artifacts”  

  1. 1 fran stevens

    Alexis I’ve wondered all these things myself. The old books in your picture invite curiosity and impel visual & tactile responses & desires. Pictorial representations in very old books are actually pasted onto the page–they are “reproductions”–so that such old books essentially contain works of art. Also, any book created before about 1985 was type-set the old fashioned way, by hand, and the fingers can in some cases feel the impressions on the page, which also show through to the other side. I wondered, before the e-book came along, whether this meant that certain type-set books would have more “collector” appeal as the decades passed, just as the hand-written & illuminated books of past centuries have great value.

Leave a Reply