I can’t imagine a news site I’d want to use less.

google news

My talk from Interaction ‘10 is up on Vimeo:

Alexis Lloyd - New Interactions with News from Interaction Design Association on Vimeo.

div xmlns:cc=http://creativecommons.org/ns# about=http://www.flickr.com/photos/lilahpops/2420799856/a rel=cc:attributionURL href=

People have been predicting that electronic books will become the primary literary format for quite a while now, but it’s only recently that the path to a predominantly e-book ecosystem has become clear. E-readers like the Kindle and devices like the iPad that are optimized for reading are still nascent technologies, but already we’re seeing mainstream use to the point where the eventual mass adoption of such devices seems obvious. There are many questions about what this will mean for reading, from behavioral shifts to economic adjustments, but the question that has been most compelling to me lately is this: What is the role of the printed book in an e-book society?

My suspicion is that the book as a physical artifact will begin to take on a position of privilege in a number of ways. One is privilege from a socio-economic standpoint, in that being able to afford physical books (And possibly even the desire for physical books) may become an indicator of class. But I think that it will also be a mark of privilege for the book itself. I was thumbing through one of Edward Tufte’s books the other day and thinking that the experience of reading his books is one that could never be effectively translated to a purely electronic medium. The sense of elegance, thoughtfulness, and importance of his books are partly conveyed by the tactile experience — the quality of the paper, the book’s dimensions and heft, the typesetting, etc. It communicates a lot of meta-information about itself through it’s object-ness. It comes back to the problem of digital objects seeming inherently more disposable and less valuable than their physical counterparts. As a result, I think that books that we deem “important” or “beautiful” will still tend to be consumed (and shared, and displayed) as physical artifacts, whereas the rest of our literary pursuits will be relegated to the more functional and lesser status as electronic media.

In writing this, I do wonder if there is any way that electronic books and publications can convey a greater importance and value. As a designer, I wonder what kinds of design interventions might bring some of the tactile joy of reading a well-designed physical book to screen-based environments.

I would love to hear your thoughts on this in the comments. What kinds of books or publications, if any, would you see as being reserved for a print experience? What kinds of design interventions might make the e-book experience better and more tangible?

Mag+

22Dec09

Posted by alexis

Beautiful snark

17Dec09

Posted by alexis
awesome critique of mindmapping from lunchbreath

Posted via web from alexis lloyd

Some lovely visualizations coming out of Visualizar ‘09. Below is a screenshot from “New Political Interfaces”…a look into what politicians vs. news outlets are talking about:

Posted via web from alexis lloyd

Did you know that… The linguistic construction of pop culture is strictly congruent with the fantasy of the gendered body?
http://writing-program.uchicago.edu/toys/randomsentence/write-sentence.htm

 

Posted via web from alexis lloyd

For his exit lecture at the “Where do we go from here?” symposium at the Louisiana Museum during the UN climate conference in Copenhagen, supercurator Hans Ulrich Obrist  compiled one of his famous lists. 

 

 

The future will be….
list compiled by Hans Ulrich Obrist

  

The future will be chrome.

Rirkrit Tiravanija

 

The future will be curved.

Olafur Eliasson

 

The future will be “in the name of the future.

Anri Sala

 

The future will be so subjective.

Tino Sehgal

 

The future will be bouclette.

Douglas Gordon

…read more at blogs.sueddeutsche.de

Posted via web from alexis lloyd

This could be a great tool…except that the visualizations have Google’s design aesthetic *sigh*.

From Read Write Web:

A recently released Google Labs product called Fusion Tables allowed users to grab data from spreadsheets, text documents, PDFs and other sources and create compelling, comprehensive visualizations from a merged data set.

Google has just announced it’s releasing an API for Fusion Tables. The API integrates with Google Maps, App Engine, Base Data and Visualizations APIs, as well, to allow for motion charts, timelines, graphs and maps with all the data available and running on Google’s infrastructure. The API allows users to upload data from any source, from text files to full databases, and see their data merged and compared in cool visualizations. Surprisingly, that’s not even the best part….


I suspect this isn’t the real thing either, but there are a few nice interface concepts in here.

Posted via web from alexis lloyd